When considering that pathogens and related diseases are currently suffering from more people worldwide than malnutrition, some health professionals are provided that the world's single health problem is no longer a heart disease or cancer than obesity. According to the World Health Organization (June 2005), obesity has reached levels of epidemiology globally with more than 1 billion adults overweight – at least 300 million of those who are clinically obese – and are a major contributor to pandemic disease and disability. Often found in developing countries with nutrition, obesity is a complicated condition, with serious social and psychological dimensions that affect all age groups and social groups. "US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (June 2005)" Over the past 20 years, adult obesity has increased significantly in the United States. The latest data from the National Center for Health Statistics show that 30 percent of adult Americans aged 20 and over – over 60 million people – are obese. This increase is not limited to adults. The proportion of young people who is overweight has more than tripled since 1980. Among children and adolescents aged 6-19 years old, 16 points nt (over 9 million young people) are considered to be overweight. "
Acute obesity is a condition that is described as 100 lbs. Or greater than the ideal weight or body weight index (BMI) is equal to or greater than 30. Being obese alone places one at a greater risk of suffering from a mixture of some other metabolism, such as high blood pressure, resistant to insulin resistance and / or having abnormal cholesterol levels all related to poor diet and lack of exercise. The sum is greater than the proportion. The problem is the risk of other diseases, but together they increase the likelihood of life-threatening illnesses such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes and stroke, etc. Up to 30.5% of our adults receive obesity diseases, and two thirds or 66% of adults are overweight, recommended to have a BMI of more than 25 years. because Americans are now over 290,000,000, some believe that up to 73,000,000 Americans could benefit some type of education awareness and / or treatment of pathogenic diet or drugs. Typically, eating habits are considered to be a bad problem when problems related to weight and / or eating habits, such as eating, eating, bingeing, cleaning and / or obsessing with diet and calories, etc.), causing them shame, guilt, and trouble with related symptoms of depression and anxiety that cause significant malformative social and / or occupational diseases at work.
We must consider that some people develop dependence on certain ways of life, such as eating, which can be as life-threatening and drug-addictive and just as socially and psychologically harmful as alcoholism. Some suffer from hormonal or metabolic diseases, but most obese individuals simply consume more calories than they burn because they are not under control of diet. Violent transgressions are often considered to be more like the problems found in these personal disease injuries that result in loss of appetite in some form (Orford, 1985). Binge-eating Disorder episode is partly characterized by the fact that you can not stop or control how much or what you are eating (DSM-IV-TR, 2000). Lienard and Vamecq (2004) have suggested an "auto-addictive" hypothesis for disease disorders. They report that "eating disorders are associated with endorphin abnormal strengths and sharing clinical lines with psychiatric abuse. The primary efficacy of endorphins has recently been shown in relation to certain aspects of normal, pathogenic and experimental eating habits versus stress, localized hyperactivity)." They report that "ill-controlled eating disorders can lead to two difficult conditions: lack of oral anxiety (loss of appetite) and excessive bulimia."
Addiction and other mental disorders usually do not develop in isolation. The comparative study (NCS), which showed all the American population in 1994, revealed that among young adults and adults (not 15 years old) in young adolescents and adolescents (15-54 years of age) had approximately 50% diagnosis time in their lives. The results of the survey showed that 35% of men have ever lost their lives in order to be able to diagnose mental illness and nearly 25% of women will be eligible for severe mood disorders (predominantly major depression). Important to find a comment from the NCS study was the extensive incidence of syntax among identified disorders. It was found that 56% of respondents with a history of at least one malfunction also had two or more additional malformations. These individuals with a history of three or more synoptic diseases were estimated to be one-sixth of Americans, or about 43 million people (Kessler, 1994).
McGinnis and Foege, 1994, report that "1990s most prominent participants in mortality were tobacco (estimated 400,000 deaths) 60,000), firearms (35,000), sexual behavior (30,000), motor vehicles (25,000) and illegal drug use (20,000). Considering that the leading cause of preventive disease and death was a risky behavioral lifestyle, the US Prevention Services Task Force put
We have found today more than ever in history that the treatment of lifestyle diseases and drugs is often a difficult and annoying task for all who are worried. Repeat mistakes are largely the case with all drugs, even by using the most effective treatment options. But why are 47% of the patients solely involved in private management strategies (for example) relapse in the first year after treatment (Gorski, T., 2001)? Have drug use become conditional on accepting a failure as a norm? There are many reasons for this poor forecast. Some would declare that drugs are psychologically induced and maintained in a semi-flexible, flexible range of driving and restraint of multi-disciplinary forces. Others would say that mistakes are due to simply lack of self-motivation or will. Most people would accept that the behavioral disease of life is a serious health risk that fosters our attention, but it may be possible for multiple drug users to be diagnosed (with one isolation) simply because of the lack of diagnostic tools and resources that are unable to solve a complex assessment and evaluation of the patient with many drugs?
To date, DSM-IV-TR has not identified an analysis for the complexity of many behavioral and chemical addicts. It has required special diagnostic technology for individuals who repeatedly use at least three groups of substances in the same 12-month period, but the criteria for this diagnosis do not involve any behavioral problems. In psychological factors affecting the state of health (DSM-IV-TR, 2000); Abuse of health problems (eg overvalued, unsafe sexual practices, excess alcohol and drug use, etc.) can only be recorded on Axis I if they have a significant effect on treatment of medical or mental illness.
As effective treatment options depend on accurate estimates, precise subjects and comprehensive individualized treatment planning, it is not surprising that repeat rehabilitation and low success are a norm instead of drug addiction when the latest DSM -IV-TR does not even contain analysis for many addictive behavioral problems. Treatment clinics need a treatment system and reference network that has carefully evaluated many addictive and mental health disorders and related treatment needs, and provides comprehensive education / awareness, prevention groups and / or certain drug treatment services for individuals diagnosed with multiple addiction. Define the goals and goals of the explanation for each individual addiction and dimension of individuals & # 39; life and precise performance or adequate criteria should be specified separately, behavioral methods (visible activity) and measurable.
To assist in solving limited DSM-IV-TRs & # 39; analysis capabilities, multidimensional analysis of "Poly-behavioral addiction," proposed for a more detailed analysis that leads to more effective treatment planning. This diagnosis involves the widest range of addictive diseases involving individuals displaying drug addiction and other obsessive behavioral behavioral addictive behaviors to bad gambling, religion and / or sex / pornography, etc.). Behavioral problems are as harmful – psychological and social as alcohol and drug use. They are comparable to other lifestyle diseases such as diabetes, hypertension and heart disease in their behavioral patterns, their tumors and resistance to treatment. They are progressive problems that involve obsession and obsession. They are also characterized by worry about continuous or regular anarchy and constant behavioral problems despite negative consequences.
Political addiction would be described as a condition of regular or prolonged physical, mental, emotional, cultural, sexual and / or mental / religious poisoning. These various types of toxoxis are produced by repeated obsessive and obsessive-related illnesses associated with any creative material, person, organization, belief system and / or activity. The individual has an overwhelming desire, need or conviction by tending to enhance their correlation with these practices and evidence of tolerance, absence and withdrawal, as there is always physical and / or psychological dependence on the effects of this pathological relationship. In addition, a 12-month period in which an individual is a serious component of three or more consequences of drugs and / or drug use at the same time, but the criteria are not met due to involuntary addiction, especially (Slobodzien, J., 2005). Basically, multidimensional addiction in conjunction with prolonged dependence on many physiological addictive substances and behaviors (eg using / abusing drugs – nicotine, alcohol and drugs and / or promoting incentives or obsessions in connection with gambling, food, sex and / or religion etc. .) at the same time.
New Experiment Analysis
The ARMS is a nonlinear, dynamic, non-hierarchical model that emphasizes interactions between multiple risk factors and placement issues such as catastrophe and chaos theory in predicting and explaining addictive behaviors and relapses. Many impacts turn on and operate under high conditions and affect the global multidimensional role of a person. The process goes back into interaction between background factors (eg family history, social assistance, years of possible consequences and cohabiting psychiatry), physiological states (eg physical assessment), intellectual processes (eg automation, desire, motivation, crime, outcome expectations) and caring skills Brownell et al., 1986; Marlatt & Gordon, 1985). In order to simply say that, small changes in individual personality behavior can lead to profound qualitative changes globally, and patterns of the global system arise only through many small relationships.
The hypothesis ARMS suggests that there is multidimensional synergistic negative resistance that individuals develop into a kind of treatment in one dimension of life, because the effects of the individual on drugs have interactive multi-dimension interaction. Maintaining a single dimension is insufficient. Traditionally, drug abuse has not been able to meet the multicompetitive negative effects of an individual who has many drugs (eg nicotine, alcohol and obesity, etc.). Behavioral drugs have a negative relationship with each other and with methods for improving general practice. They tend to encourage tobacco, alcohol and other drugs, help to increase violence, reduce activity and promote social isolation. Most therapists currently assess other dimensions for diagnosing a dual diagnosis or diagnosis, or assessing participation that may play a role in the primary addiction of the individual. The ARMS theory states that a multi-purpose treaty will be designed to deal with potentially many drugs that are defined for each individual lifetime, as well as developing specific goals and goals for each dimension.
The ARMS recognizes the complex and unpredictable nature of lifestyle drugs in response to individual commitment to accept assistance in changing their lives. The level of modeling of the model (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1984) is supported as a model of motivation, with five levels ready to change: contemplation, consideration, preparation, operations and maintenance. ARMS theory supports the development of automation and social connections as an explanation of future behavior on a variety of lifestyle risks (Bandura, 1977). To prevent cognitive regression (Marlatt, 1985), with a view to identifying and preventing risk factors for relapses, is also supported by the ARMS theory.
ARMS continues to introduce twelve step-by-step groups, such as drugs and alcohol consumption, along with spiritual and religious recovery as a necessary way to maintain success. The potential effect of AA is partly attributable to changing the social networking network's network of drinking friends with a community of AA members who can provide encouragement and support to maintain abstinence (Humphreys, K., Mankowski, ES, 1999) and Morgenstern, J. Labouvie , E. McCrady, BS; Kahler, CW; and Frey, RM, 1997). In addition, the AA approach often leads to the development of therapeutic skills, many of which are similar to those known for more organized psychosocial treatment options, thus leading to a reduction of alcohol consumption (NIAAA, June 2005).
The US Drugs Abuse (2003), "Patients Location Criteria for Treating Drug-Related Disorders, 3rd Edition," has set the standard of drug use to recognize the overall participation of the individual in his or her life or life. This involves internal interconnection of many dimensions from biological to mental, as well as the external relationship of the individual with the family and larger social groups. Drugs in ways of life can affect many domains that an individual has in mind and often requires multiple treatment. Actual progress, however, requires appropriate interventions and stimulating methods for each dimension of individual life.
The Drug Abuse System (ARMS) has defined the following seven areas of treatment to: (1) assist physicians in defining additional training techniques that can increase individual awareness to be successful: (2) recommend effective treatment, and (3) measure after successful treatment results:
PD- 1. Delivery / Relapse: Progress Dimension
PD- 2. Biological / Physical: Progressive Dimension
PD- 3. Mental / Emotional: Progress Dimension
PD- 4 . Social / Cultural: Progress Cases
PD- 5. Education / Occupation: Progress Cases
PD-6. Perspective / Behavior: Progressive Dimension
PD- 7. Spiritual / Religious: Progressive Dimension
Given the fact that drugs involve unequal lifestyles operating within a semi-stable equilibrium strength, ARMS promotes philosophy that positive handling effectiveness and effective results are a consequence of a synergistic relationship with the "Higher Power" that mentally rises and associates individuals & # 39; Multiple way of life by reducing chaos and increased resilience to achieve a unique harmony, ease and productivity.
Consequences of recovery measurements – subsystems
Since long-term life-threatening diseases and diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, alcoholism, drug and behavioral problems can not be cure, but only succeeds.
The Arms Monitoring System (ARMS) is proposed to utilize multidimensional integrated assessment, treatment planning, treatment progress and therapeutic measurements that facilitate rapid and accurate recognition and assessment of the overall quality of life of the individual. progress. "ARMS" – systematic, methodological, interactive, and spiritually combines the following five versatile subsystems that can be used or combined:
1) The predictive system – composed of twelve screening devices developed to evaluate an individual s overall life expectancy measurements on a comprehensive life-social assessment for objective 5-axis analysis with local global assessment of score scores;
2) The Reaction Measurement Goal – which includes the Target Measurement Intervention Measurement Measurement Measurement Measurement Measurement Measurement TIM (TIM)
3) The Progress Point System – Standard Relational Response Rate System Used to Produce Progress in the Treatment of Six life-styles of individual sizes;
4) The multidimensional measurement system – with measurements of measurement groups (A) and (B), along with ARMS emissions guidelines, uses a multidisciplinary measurement group to assist in the graduation program; and
5) Treatment outcome of the evaluation system – which utilizes the following two measuring instruments: a) Treatment objectives (TOM); and (b) Global Assessment Progress (GAP), to assist in the monitoring of a treatment plan.
At the end of the Cold War, the threat of the nuclear warfare has diminished significantly. It may be hard to imagine that in the end, actors can be using humor in the fact that it was not a nuclear weapon, but "French fries" that destroyed humanity. In a serious remark, lifestyle diseases and drugs are leading to the prevention of disease and death, but short-term preventive and non-medical counseling activities are still lacking in health care (Whitlock, 2002).
The US Preventive Services Task Force concluded that effective behavioral measures related to personal health care programs are more promising to improve health than many other precautionary measures, such as routine early screening (USPSTF, 1996). Common health-promoting behavior involves healthy diet, regular exercise, smoking, proper use of alcohol / medication and responsible sexual practices to include condoms and contraception.
350 National Organizations and 250 State Public Health, Mental Health, Drug Use and Environmental Organizations support the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the "Healthy People 2010" program. This national initiative recommends that clinics use clinical prophylaxis and short-term treatment measures to diagnose early, prevent and treat lifestyle diseases and addictions for all patients "at every healthcare visit."
Co-operation and coordination among service providers, government departments and community organizations in providing treatment plans are essential to address the multifaceted multivitamins solution. I urge you to support mental health and drugs in America and hope that the resources (ARMS) can assist you in the personal fight against the risk of pathogenic trauma within the multi-movement
For more information see:
Drug Addiction and Drug Addiction,
By James Slobodzien, Psy.D., CSAC on:
Drug addicts Unnamed:
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders, fourth edition,
Text revision. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2000, p. 787 and p. 731.
American Society of Addiction Medicine (2003), "Patients Location Criteria for
Treatment of Metabolism, 3rd Edition." Author, June 18, 2005, from:
http: // www .asam.org /
Bandura, A. (1977), automation: combining theory of behavioral changes. Psychological review,
Brownell, KD, Marlatt, GA, Lichtenstein, E , And Wilson, GT (1986). Understanding and Preventing the Return of American Psychologist 41, 765-782.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). June 18, 2005, from: //www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/obesity/
Gorski, T. (2001), Prevention of Backlash in the Management Environment. GORSKI-CENAPS Web
Healthy People 2010. Retrieved June 20, 2005, from: http://www.healthyoutube.gov/
Publications. Get June 20, 2005, from: http: //www.tgorski .com
Lienard, J. & Vamecq, J . (2004), Press Med, October 23, 33 (18 supplement): 33-40.
Marlatt, GA (1985). Prevention Prevention: Theoretical ratione and overview of the model. In GA
Marlatt & JR Gordon (Eds.), Relapse Prevention (pages 250-280). New York: Guilford Press.
McGinnis JM, Foege WH (1994). Actual cause of death in the United States. US Department of Health and Anthropology, Washington, DC 20201
Humphreys, K .; Mankowski, ES; Moos, RH; and Finney, JW (1999). Do increased friendships and active responses share the impact of self-help groups on metabolism? Ann Behav With 21 (1): 54-60.
Kessler, RC, McGonagle, KA, Zhao, S., Nelson, CB, Hughes, M., Eshleman, S., Wittchen, H. H, -U, & Kendler, KS (1994). Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disease in the United States
State: Results from the macroeconomic survey. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 51, 8-19.
Morgenstern, J .; Labouvie, E .; McCrady, BS; Kahler, CW; and Frey, RM (1997). Relationship with anonymous alcoholics after treatment: Study on the efficacy and mode of action. J Consult Clin Psychol 65 (5): 768-777.
Orford, J. (1985). Excessive stomach: Psychological view of addiction. New York: Wiley.
Prochaska, JO, & DiClemente, CC (1984). Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing Limit Treatment. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Slobodzien, J. (2005). Poly-addictive addiction and Addictions Recovery Measurement System (ARMS), Booklocker.com, Inc., p. 5.
Whitlock, EP (1996). Evaluating basic treatment counseling: Evidence based on evidence. Is J Former With 2002; 22 (4): 267-84. William and Wilkins. US Prevention Service Task Force. Guidance on clinical preventive services. 2nd edition. Alexandria, VA.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010 (Conference Edition). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000.
Health Institute, (WHO). Downloaded June 18, 2005, from: http://www.who.int/topics/obesity/en/